W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: More tests

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:33:57 -0500
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1064504036.23394.4188.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 09:04, Ian Horrocks wrote:
> One type of test that we are missing is small tests that, while
> potentially easy may prove difficult for some naive implementations.

In general, the more tests the merrier...

But it's be even more interesting if you can
relate this test to some use case or requirement;
e.g. "this test demonstrates a pattern that
comes up a lot in modelling oil refinery
options; if your implementation can't do this,
you're not going to be able to sell it to the
oil industry."

> Attached is an example of such a test. The "TEST" class, and hence the
> ontology, is inconsistent. I would like to add several of these kinds
> of test to the test suite.
> 
> I would be interested to hear how the various implementations fare on
> this test (FaCT can pass it in about 10ms, not including parsing).
> 
> The test is currently in DL but could easily be converted into Lite.
> 
> Regards, Ian
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2003 11:33:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT