I dreamt up the following test A consistent lite document: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xml:base="http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/imports/consistent012" > <owl:Ontology rdf:about="http://example.org/"> <owl:imports> <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""/> </owl:imports> </owl:Ontology> </rdf:RDF> ===== In triples: <http://example.org/> rdf:type owl:Ontology . <imports/consistent012> rdf:type owl:Ontology . <http://example.org/> owl:imports <imports/consistent012> . It will break naive implementations that do not do the includes check on owl:imports. JeremyReceived on Monday, 22 September 2003 07:32:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT