W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: OWL Test Results page, built from RDF

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 15:18:13 +0200
To: "Sandro Hawke <sandro" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: jjc@hpl.hp.com, sandro@roke.hawke.org, www-webont-wg@w3.org, hendler@cs.umd.edu
Message-ID: <OF9C1F4CA7.5C443A9F-ONC1256D99.0039CB68-C1256D99.00492012@agfa.be>


Sandro wrote:
> > Well Jim, it's due to some (2 I guess) rather long
> > rtest:description's in the Manifest - I guess
> > we could either change the Manifest, or Sandro
> > could clip them after a certain length (and end
> > with ... or some such) - suggest the latter ;-)
>
> Was that you volunteering to fix the test descriptions, Jos?  :_)

:_)

> They're just PROPOSED, so it's editor's discretion.

OK - DONE
Did cvs commit -m "more compact rtest:description + added rdfs:comment"
for
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/description-logic/Manifest501
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/description-logic/Manifest502
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/Manifest
and it now looks better when regenerating
http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out
with
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/temp/owl-result.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2003/08/surnia/test-results/00013/results.rdf
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Sep/att-0005/_xxx.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/Manifest.rdf
(that last one instead of
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/Manifest.rdf)


> Alternatively, I suppose you could explain to me how the test
> repository is maintained (or point me to such documentation).

There is some useful info from Jeremy at
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/INSTALL
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/README

>     -- sandro

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2003 09:18:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT