W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2003

RE: Test Results Organisation

From: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:24:16 +0100
Message-ID: <3BE4D3F0FB726240966DEF40418472B51C8923@ni-lon-server1.ad.networkinference.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "Sean Bechhofer" <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

We also think this is an excellent idea.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@research.bell-labs.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:20 AM
> To: Sean Bechhofer
> Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Test Results Organisation
> 
> 
> 
> From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
> Subject: Test Results Organisation
> Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 12:42:48 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
> 
> > 
> > 
> > A while ago I raised the possibility of splitting the 
> display of test
> > results to take into account the different species levels 
> as well as the
> > approved/proposed status [1]. This would have the benefit 
> of making it
> > easier to identify whether implementations targeting a particular
> > language species were on track (and determining whether, 
> for example, an
> > implementation provides a substantial subset of DL [cf. 
> exit criterion
> > 4]).
> > 
> > I would have thought this would be relatively easy to do as the
> > information is all there in the manifests. Can I propose that we
> > make this change?
> > 
> > 	Sean
> > 
> > [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0130.html
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sean Bechhofer
> > seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
> > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
> > 
> I think that this as an excellent idea.
> 
> peter
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:24:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT