Re: RDF schema of OWL

On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 23:22, Guus Schreiber wrote:
[...]
> Rationale:
> - pointer to WG home page should be sufficient


no, the Working Group is a temporary phenomenon; the ontology
is defined by the specs, which last much longer. They
might be maintained by a different working group in the
future.

I think it's important to cite the dated normative specs,
and useful to point to the latest version of
the informative specs.


> - versionInfo is the appropriate slot for the cvs info

yes.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/