W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > November 2003

RE: expected test donations

From: Charles White <Charles.White@networkinference.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:39:58 -0000
Message-ID: <3BE4D3F0FB726240966DEF40418472B54DE12D@ni-lon-server1.ad.networkinference.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <haarslev@cs.concordia.ca>, <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>

Jeremy,

We also have a bunch of tests that we would like to submit, however, it sounds like they will overlap with the tests from Bijan, et al, as what we are trying to do is get a bunch of the OWL Full tests to OWL DL also.

I will trade lists with bijan to see what he is planning on submitting.

chas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:37 AM
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Cc: haarslev@cs.concordia.ca; bparsia@isr.umd.edu
> Subject: expected test donations
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am expecting two sets of donations in the next week or so, 
> with additional
> tests to be included in the test suite.
> 
> The first lot is from Bijan et al. There is the frequent 
> request to have
> many of the OWL Full tests that are nearly in DL to be 
> expressed in DL,
> since Pellet knows how to do the patch up in some cases, in 
> those cases we
> will get the patched files - and I will add these as additional tests.
> 
> The second lot is from the racer team who have some 
> classification tests
> which they think would enhance our test suite. I expect that 
> will need a new
> subsection in the DL tests part of the document.
> 
> I bring these to the groups attention in that it is somewhat 
> late in the day
> to be adding a significant number of extra tests and if this 
> is a mistake it
> would be better to know before either team do much work 
> towards producing
> these.
> 
> Hopefully, we will also get a test report out of the racer 
> team as well :)
> [This will be particularly vital *if* the tests prove too 
> difficult for
> other systems]
> 
> I guess we should be planning towards PR which would mean for 
> instance, not
> adding extra tests after some date, so that we can get all 
> our reports into
> shape.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 12:40:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT