On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 13:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > There is one change that needs either work or discussion, namely > > > Section 3.4 > > Unnamed ontologies: informally, multiple Annontations on an unnamed > > ontology don't need to be satisfied by the same "x" according to this > > table. Don't think that's right. > > Correct. It is not right. Fixing it will require some surgery to Section > 3.4. This may need further discussion in the working group. > > but this response explicitly excludes this one comment. Ah; yes. right. > peter -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 14:27:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT