W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: potential discussion topic from Re: proposed reploy for ``OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments''

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 30 May 2003 13:28:09 -0500
To: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1054319289.906.331.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 13:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> There is one change that needs either work or discussion, namely
> 
> > Section 3.4
> > Unnamed ontologies: informally, multiple Annontations on an unnamed
> > ontology don't need to be satisfied by the same "x" according to this
> > table. Don't think that's right.
> 
> Correct.  It is not right.  Fixing it will require some surgery to Section
> 3.4.  This may need further discussion in the working group.
> 
> but this response explicitly excludes this one comment.

Ah; yes. right.

> peter
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 14:27:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT