Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:54:28 -0400

> At 3:37 PM -0400 5/29/03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >I don't see anything in what Guus quotes to indicate that there has been a
> >decision on whether owl:sameAs is in OWL DL.
> >
> >peter
> 
> 
> WG decided that owl:sameAs is a synonym for owl:sameIndividualAs (issue 4.6)
> owl:sameIndividualAs is in OWL Lite 
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#2.2)
> 
> I therefore read our record (based on a simple syllogism) as placing 
> owl:sameAs in Lite.

I disagree that this follows.

> Both chairs now agree that the WG did indeed decide owl:sameAs is in DL/Lite.
> 
>   Could one of the editors of S&AS please make the change, or offer 
> new evidence that the chairs should reconsider the decision
>   thanks
>   JH


peter