On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 14:58, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > I believe that as we enter the last call comment review period on the other > docs it is inevitable that we will have open issues. > It is unfortunate that test was behind the other docs, but it was; and given > that, the test editors can only make best efforts at hitting a moving target > until our issue list stabalizes again before CR or PR. > > I believe that it would perhaps be advantageous to take the Test LC vote first > tomorrow - and just accept that some of the LC comments we've already had may > impact the next version of Test, just like they may impact the next version > of the other docs. > > If there is a test case (for owl:Class rdfs:Class) proposed I can add it > before a last call vote, or take an action to add it before lc publication, > but if we are still in the thinking stage, I would be disappointed if that > were to hold up a test LC. I concur; adding this test is asynchronous with deciding to take test to last call. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:50:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT