W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: raised in comment: owl:class still needed? Does this effect Test LC?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 14 May 2003 16:48:25 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1052948905.20114.598.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 14:58, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> I believe that as we enter the last call comment review period on the other 
> docs it is inevitable that we will have open issues.
> It is unfortunate that test was behind the other docs, but it was; and given 
> that, the test editors can only make best efforts at hitting a moving target 
> until our issue list stabalizes again before CR or PR.
> I believe that it would perhaps be advantageous to take the Test LC vote first 
> tomorrow - and just accept that some of the LC comments we've already had may 
> impact the next version of Test, just like they may impact the next version 
> of the other docs. 
> If there is a test case (for owl:Class rdfs:Class) proposed I can add it 
> before a last call vote, or take an action to add it before lc publication, 
> but if we are still in the thinking stage, I would be disappointed if that 
> were to hold up a test LC.

I concur; adding this test is asynchronous with deciding to
take test to last call.

> Jeremy
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 17:50:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:53 UTC