- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:18:20 -0400
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
JimH writes:
> 2 - section 7.3 (which falls within the normative status of section 7)
> states:
>
> The following additional namespace prefix is used in this section:
> oiled http://oiled.man.example.uk/test#
>
> is it appropriate/permissible for us to have normative tests that
> point to a namespace out of W3C control? Copying the above file into
> our space, or (if it's the case) stating that tools don't have to
> dereference this ns would be solutions, or changing 7.3 to
> informative would all work. If the WG is comfortable, and process
> allows, the ns ref out of W3C space, I am fine with it.
Thanks for catching that! I'm not sure whether marking it
"informative" would even help, given how the policy [1] is worded.
Is there any problem with changing it to a w3.org namespace?
-- sandro
[1] http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:18:21 UTC