W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: TEST: last call candidate

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:18:20 -0400
Message-Id: <200305141718.h4EHIKrt002901@roke.hawke.org>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

JimH writes:
> 2 - section 7.3 (which falls within the normative status of section 7)
> states:
> The following additional namespace prefix is used in this section: 
>     oiled     http://oiled.man.example.uk/test#
> is it appropriate/permissible for us to have normative tests that 
> point to a namespace out of W3C control?  Copying the above file into 
> our space, or (if it's the case) stating that tools don't have to 
> dereference this ns would be solutions, or changing 7.3 to 
> informative would all work.  If the WG is comfortable, and process 
> allows, the ns ref out of W3C space, I am fine with it.

Thanks for catching that!  I'm not sure whether marking it
"informative" would even help, given how the policy [1] is worded.
Is there any problem with changing it to a w3.org namespace? 

     -- sandro

[1] http://www.w3.org/1999/10/nsuri
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:18:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:53 UTC