W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:59:07 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEKHCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



A third possibility would be "SHOULD" instead of "should" past tests - as a
sort of compromise.

It may mean that our work fits better with other recommendations etc that
assume that it is sufficiently clear what an OWL implementation is intended
to do.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 12:59:22 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jeff Heflin: "Re: TEST: last call candidate (?)"
Previous message: Deborah L. McGuinness: "Re: owl:All(something) ??"
In reply to: Jeremy Carroll: "RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT