W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

RE: complete checkers should or MUST pass tests

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 18:59:07 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "WebOnt WG" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEKHCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


A third possibility would be "SHOULD" instead of "should" past tests - as a
sort of compromise.

It may mean that our work fits better with other recommendations etc that
assume that it is sufficiently clear what an OWL implementation is intended
to do.

Jeremy
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 12:59:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT