> > here's a question -- if RDF allows these triples and OWL requires > them, does that cause a layering issue? That is, could RDF say > "SHOULD" or "MAY" instead of must, with a note that for compatibility > with OWL it is recommended? I don't like this idea - it is just asking for non-interoperability. This construct was added for OWL; lets keep it doing the right thing. An RDFS or OWL Full processor that chooses to throw these redundant triples away is fully conforming. JeremyReceived on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 08:20:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT