- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 14:17:23 +0200
- To: "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "webont" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
> > here's a question -- if RDF allows these triples and OWL requires > them, does that cause a layering issue? That is, could RDF say > "SHOULD" or "MAY" instead of must, with a note that for compatibility > with OWL it is recommended? I don't like this idea - it is just asking for non-interoperability. This construct was added for OWL; lets keep it doing the right thing. An RDFS or OWL Full processor that chooses to throw these redundant triples away is fully conforming. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 08:20:24 UTC