W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:26:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030505.092607.28682701.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

I'm still waiting for permission to go ahead with my response to much of
this comment.

peter


From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:58:58 -0400 (EDT)

> From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html
> Date: 23 Apr 2003 09:30:06 -0500
> 
> > On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 07:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 
> > > I propose 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 	Because there is no standard way to go from a URI reference to an
> > > 	XML Schema datatype in an XML Schema, there is no standard way to
> > > 	use user-defined XML Schema in OWL.
> > 
> > That looks good.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> > 
> 
> So should I respond?
> 
> peter
Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 09:26:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT