W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

equivalent RDF->equivalent OWL: outstanding dissent?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 27 Mar 2003 10:32:00 -0600
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1048782720.15095.8.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

I'm auditing our records for dissent, and I find:

"RESOLUTION: All RDF/XML documents that are equivalent under the RDF
Recommendation are equivalent OWL exchange documents 
==> 14 in favor -- 3 opposed"
 -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html

The record doesn't say who was opposed. Does whoever
it was want to carry their dissent into our request
for Candidate Rec/Proposed Rec? If so, you'll need
to let me know who you are, and you'll have to write
or help me find your argument.

"A formal objection should include technical arguments and propose
changes that would remove the dissenter's objection; these proposals may
be vague or incomplete."
  -- http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/groups.html#WGVotes

Unless somebody steps forward, I'm going to treat
the "opposed" votes as abstentions or some other
form of water-under-the-bridge-by-now.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 11:32:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT