From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl> Subject: Re: B.1, B.2 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:09:48 +0100 > Peter, > > As Jim said last week, the chairs are willing to reopen 5.26 wrt. B1 & > B2 if we can solve it beofre LC. It seems Jeremy has proposed wording > for changing the document, and also offered two possibilities for > handling work on the proof. Given this, could you agree to making this > change? As I said during the telecon, in my view it was in the spirit of > the editors meeting to see the proposal as one complete set, and it > seems to me Jeremy has proposed a way to include B1/B2 without requiring > you to spend much time on it. > > Thanks for considering this, > > Guus I don't view either of the proposals on how to handle the proof as desirable. peterReceived on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 16:36:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT