Re: pfps comments - clarification

From: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Subject: pfps comments - clarification
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:32:28 -0800

> 
> peter suggested the following:
> 
> "abstract - I suggest
>                 OWL has three increasingly-expressive sublanguages: OWL
>                 Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full."
> 
> have we decided that OWL Full is a sublanguage of OWL?

Note that this doesn't say ``proper sublanguages''.  :-)

> I am using the following for the moment.  If this is incorrect, let me
> know:
> 
> The OWL language family includes three increasingly-expressive
> languages: OWL
>                 Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full."

Hmm.  I don't think that there is any good an concise way of stating the
exact details of the situation.  I'm now no longer sure which of the
non-ideal concise sentences is best here.

peter