- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:07:10 -0600
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:53, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > By accident I visited the RDF home page (http://www.w3.org/RDF/) and > noticed that the RDF suite of specificaitons included the OWL requirements, > OWL reference, OWL abstact syntax, OWL feature synopsis, and OWL test > cases. > > I am unhappy with this characterisation of the OWL document, and of the Web > Ontology working group in general. The work that went into the design of > OWL was part of the W3C Semantic Web activity, not part of RDF. I ask that > it not be mischaracterised as part of RDF. Ooops; I brought that up with EricM a while ago, and we agreed to fix it, but we didn't get around to it. It's fixed now. v 1.151 2003/03/10 20:04:06 > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Bell Labs Research > Lucent Technologies -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 10 March 2003 15:15:07 UTC