W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: 3 Reasons for not having XMLLiteral in DL

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:18:53 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030305.101853.01429451.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

I see that Raphael has inadvertently produced a good example of why RDF
containers are problematic.

peter


From: "Raphael Volz" <volz@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Subject: 3 Reasons for not having XMLLiteral in DL
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 10:00:34 -0500

[...]

> 1)	Usability aspect: Increase of modelling alternatives

[...]

> 2)	Nesting RDF

[...]

> 4)	Argument of opening OWL to multitude of other XML technologies
> 	is "broken" (to speak in PPS terminology)

[...]
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 10:19:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT