Re: Proposed response to: Comments on Owl REF document

I skimmed this; it looks responsive to the comment
and consistent with the proceedings of the WG.

Please send it.

On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:13, Guus Schreiber wrote:
> Brian McBride wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0054.html
> 
>  > In reviewing the Owl Reference last call WD at
>  >
>  >    http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-ref-20030331/
>  >
>  > for RDFCore, I noticed the following comments that were not directly
>  > related to RDFCore's interests.
>  >
>  > Brian
> 
> Brian,
> 
> Thanks very much for these helpful comments. Unless indicated
> otherwise below we have made the changes you suggested.
[...]
> 
> [1] http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 10:51:17 UTC