> > However, this does not violate any of the claims in S&AS, as the relevant > theorem is that if an entailment holds in OWL DL then it holds in OWL Full, > not vice versa. > > I will change the note in Appendix A to > > <p><strong>Note:</strong> > The only if direction > <span class="change"> > is not true. > </span> > </p> > > peter > Hmmm, ... the test cases document currently assumes that OWL DL and OWL Full entailment are the same on the syntactic subset - I will need to review it. JeremyReceived on Thursday, 19 June 2003 07:50:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT