W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Minutes of June 12 Telecon

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:02:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030613.120214.97783344.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: Charles.White@networkinference.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

The situation with respect to the comments I am responsible for is not
accurate.  I had already responded to the initial message from Jim on this,
but guess that my response has not made it into the list.

Here is some more accurate information on the status of these comments.


> ---> OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments (Fri, May 09 
> 2003) [no reply received] - Peter?
> Peter to respond

This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0050.html
from Jan Grant.  I sent a response to comments on 30 May as
2003May/0121.html.  I also sent a proposed response to the wg on 4 June and
a revised response to the wg on 5 June.  I had only one approval, but I
will send the response out.

> ---> Comments from RDFCore on S+AS (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply
>       received] - discussed, but not answered - Peter?
> Peter to respond

This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html
from Brian McBride (for RDF Core WG).  I sent a proposed reply to the wg as
2003May/0110.html on 9 May 2003.  I have not received any approval to send
this message.  The wg voted to make a substantive change to address one of
the comments in this message, on 29 May 2003.  I have updated the response
to incorporate this change.


> ---> Review section 4.1 of OWL AS&S (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply
>       received] - Peter?
> Ian to respond

This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0055.html
I have not done anything yet with respect to this comment.

> ---> OWL S&AS comment - owl:Ontology mapping to/from RDF triples
>       (Fri, May 09 2003) [no reply received] - Note - this is mistitled
>       - Peter, please look at it.
> Peter responded - no reply received

This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0057.html
from Dave Beckett.  I sent a response on 30 May as 2003May/0123.html, Dave
has responded that all is well (2003Jun/0001.html) and the comment is
officially closed.

> ---> S&AS (and some general OWL Lite, CR, & implementation) comments
actually Semantics and Abstract Syntax ...
>       (Fri, May 09 2003)
>       [no reply received] several comments, mostly editorial, on
>       contentive -- Peter?
> Peter already responded

This is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0069.html
from Bijan Parsia.  A response was sent to comments 30 May 2003 as 2003May/0124.html.



I have sent proposed responses for the following other comments and am
awaiting approval to send them.


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html
	Jeff Z. Pan
	Editorial Changes - done 14 April
	- reply2.msg; sent to comments
	- reply12.msg; sent to wg 4 June

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Apr/0065.html
	Jeremy Carroll
	status of rdf:XMLLiteral
	- reply12.msg; sent to wg 4 June

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0083.html
	Jena team
	mapping to triples
	- some changes in the works
	- reply10.msg sent to WG as 2003May/0417.html on 30 May 2003
	- no reply from Guus
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 12:03:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT