W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: OWL in RDF

From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:16:22 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.44.0306131215520.2444-100000@potato>

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
> Subject: OWL in RDF
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:09:25 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)
>
> >
> >
> > Just putting some extra words together for this appendix. I believe the
> > following to be true, but would appreciate a quick sanity check:
> >
> > [[
> > With the exception of predicates within the OWL, RDF and RDFS
> > namespaces, annotation properties are the <strong>only</strong> predicates
> > that can appear in triples with an OWL class or property as the subject.
> > ]]
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > 	Sean
>
> Well aside changing ``namespaces'' to ``vocabularies'', I believe this to
> be true.  Of course, not all such predicates can appear in such triples.

Sure. Hopefully those extra restrictions are dealt with elsewhere in the
appendix.

	Sean

-- 
Sean Bechhofer
seanb@cs.man.ac.uk
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanb
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 07:18:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT