- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 11 Jun 2003 13:47:11 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Further to my action to get confirmation from I18N WG that our last call spec is I18N-happy... I talked with Martin in Budapest a couple weeks ago. Since then, he collected his thoughts on RDF literals and such... Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend) Martin Duerst (Thu, Jun 05 2003) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0023.html and the RDF Core WG is working thru them. I'm still reasonably confident that OWL doesn't introduce any I18N issues; that if RDF Core satisfies the I18N WG (without making changes that we don't like) then I18N WG will be happy with OWL too. Martin, if you could confirm, tentatively, that would help. Or should we expect specific review comments on the OWL specs from the I18N WG? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 14:47:07 UTC