W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics Jan 30 (updated)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:37:43 +0100
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200301300937.43238.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

> The current proposal, by Jeremy [1], is to include all of
> rdfs:label
> rdfs:comment
> rdfs:seeAlso
> rdfs:isDefinedBy

> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jan/0323.html

That msg was intended to point out a minimal set of required things that did 
not appear to be included.
Other annotations that are widely used in DAML+OIL include those from Dublin 
Core. (Mentioned in our requirements doc).
Also, it seems unmotivated to restrict the RDFS position of allowing 
user-defined annotations.

Moreover, the msg cited does not propose any semantic solution.

My msg from this morning:


is a proposed solution.
This solution is illustrated in the (ongoing) work on syntax:

Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 03:37:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:51 UTC