W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: abstract syntax and RDFS

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:48:26 +0100
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDEEPMCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

Thanks for all of these, your [opt] notation is better than mine.

> -----Original Message-----

> > The problem is that every RDFS schema contains triples like
> > 
> > <uri1> rdf:type rdf:Property .
> > and
> > <uri2> rdf:type rdfs:Class .
> > 
> > These triples are simply illegal in OWL Lite and OWL DL.
> > 
> > But they could be (non-deterministically) introduced in the 
> mapping rules.
> 
[snip]
> Done for all *four* Class rules.
> 
[ snip ]
> Done.
[snip]
> Done.
> 
> I also had to fix the informative portion as well.
> 
> peter
> 
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:48:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT