W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

GUIDE comment [was Re: comments on ASS]

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:22:18 +0100
Message-ID: <3E22D9AA.1090101@swi.psy.uva.nl>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
> Subject: Re: comments on ASS
> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:06 +0100
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>>>OWL Lite has had defined classes from the beginning.   If the Guide
>>>indicates otherwise, it needs to be fixed.
>>
>>So, this is a legal OWL Lite axiom according to the AS&S. If, so we have 
>>to correct this in the Guide.
>>
>><owl:Class rdf:ID="TexasThings">
>>   <owl:sameClassAs>
>>     <owl:Restriction>
>>       <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#locatedIn" />
>>       <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#TexasRegion" />
>>     </owl:Restriction>
>>   </owl:sameClassAs>
>></owl:Class>
>>
>>Note that this only holds for restrictions. Set operators or enumeration 
>>in this type of axiom would be non-lite.
> 
> 
> Yes, the above is legal OWL Lite.

Mike/Chris,

This means the Guide example should be changed. If the example is 
changed to use intersection/union/complement/oneof, then it is in 
OWL/DL. Alternatively, you could keep the example and mark it as OWL DL.

Guus

-- 
A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam,
http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 10:29:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT