W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

OWL Lite vs OWL/Lite; OWL DL vs OWL/DL; OWL Full vs. OWL/Full

From: Deborah McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 19:53:36 -0800
Message-ID: <3E150940.24457A65@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

i thought we had decided on
OWL Lite
and OWL Full

that is what i see being used in synopsis, req, and guide.
i notice though use of  OWL/Lite, OWL/DL , and OWL/Full in the semantics

i prefer the space to the / but i dont have a strong opinion about this
- i just think we should be consistent.

 Deborah L. McGuinness
 Knowledge Systems Laboratory
 Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241
 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020
 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
 URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm
 (voice) 650 723 9770    (stanford fax) 650 725 5850   (computer fax)
801 705 0941
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 22:48:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:50 UTC