Hi: What is the status of http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema Are they normative parts of the RDF specifications? I don't see how, because 1/ Neither of them are valid in the RDF Model Theory or the RDFS model theory. 2/ http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns does not have elements that correspond to all the elements of the RDF namespace. If they are not normative, what is their status? One reason that I ask is that WebOnt has a similar sort of document http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl with some of the same problems, but because of owl:imports the actual contents of the document matters more. In fact, owl:imports makes the contents of http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema matter more. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent TechnologiesReceived on Thursday, 2 January 2003 22:30:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT