W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Review of Semantics Documnt

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:02:47 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f70ba3a66b203c4@[10.0.1.3]>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

At 13:13 -0500 1/2/03, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

(lots of snips)

>From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
>Subject: Review of Semantics Documnt
>Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 17:36:58 -0500
>
>

>
>>  3) The following sentences from section 3 is technically fine, but
>>  some what odd
>>
>>  >The semantics here starts with the notion of a vocabulary, which can
>>  >be thought of as the URI references that are of interest in an OWL
>>  >ontology. It is, however, not necessary that a vocabulary consist
>>  >only of the URI references in an OWL ontology.
>>
>>  maybe reqord to make clearer (I'm okay leaving as is, but it might 
>>be improved)
>
>I'm not sure how to make this clearer.

I couldn't think of a rewrite either, so "stet" as they say.

>
>>  4) near end of section 3 it says:
>>
>>  >An Abstract OWL ontology entails an OWL axiom or fact if each
>>  >interpretation of the ontology is also an interpretation of the
>>  >axiom or fact. An Abstract OWL ontology entails another Abstract OWL
>>  >ontology if each interpretation of the first ontology is also an
>>  >interpretation of the second ontology
>>
>>  are these "if" or should they be "if and only if" (in particular for
>>  the second one)
>
>Hmm.  The convention is to say if here, because it is defining entailment,
>but to mean iff.  I'm rather unwilling to make a change.

Generally this doesn't bother me, but in the case of the second one, 
it seemed useful to know if it was if or iff - if it's clear from 
context, then I'm happy to leave it.

>
>
>>  7) I'm not opposed to Appendix B, but in my mind it isn't of much
>>  use, could be deleted
>
>Hmm. I would be willing to delete it as well, but I seem to remember some
>comments to the effect that examples were needed.

I have a feeling that it may not be needed anymore (i.e. I think the 
issues were addressed elsewhere) - maybe keep it in mind for deletion 
if there doesn't seem to be a call for it by other WOWGers



-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 17:02:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT