- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 06:28:21 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr (Jerome Euzenat)
Subject: Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:56:12 +0100
> Hello,
>
> In his message (OWL/DL in RDF graphs) of 30/12/2002,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >I finally figured out a (silly) way to make the ontology triple optional in
> >translated OWL/DL ontologies. I just allow OWL ontologies to be bare
> >sequences of directives wihtout the enclosing Ontology(...)
> >
> ><ontology> ::= Ontology ( {<directive>} )
> > | {<directive>}
> >
>
> If this is supposed to be the presentation syntax and directive is
> the current directive_1 directive_n, I recall you that an XML
> document must have exactly one root element.
I don't think that this is a problem. This is for the abstract syntax,
which is not XML.
> Best wishes for the new year,
> --
> Jérôme Euzenat __
peter
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 06:28:33 UTC