W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 06:28:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030102.062821.46633455.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr (Jerome Euzenat)
Subject: Re: OWL/DL in RDF graphs
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:56:12 +0100

> Hello,
> 
> In his message (OWL/DL in RDF graphs) of 30/12/2002,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >I finally figured out a (silly) way to make the ontology triple optional in
> >translated OWL/DL ontologies.  I just allow OWL ontologies to be bare
> >sequences of directives wihtout the enclosing Ontology(...)
> >
> >&lt;ontology&gt; ::= Ontology ( {&lt;directive&gt;} )
> >                    | {&lt;directive&gt;}
> >
> 
> If this is supposed to be the presentation syntax and directive is 
> the current directive_1 directive_n, I recall you that an XML 
> document must have exactly one root element.

I don't think that this is a problem.  This is for the abstract syntax,
which is not XML.

> Best wishes for the new year,
> -- 
>   Jérôme Euzenat                  __

peter
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 06:28:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT