On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 09:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > There is an alternative, however, which I think is preferable in some ways. > > OWL could have something like > > <owl:AllDistinct rdf:parseType="Collection"> > <owl:Person rdf:about="#John"/> > <owl:Person rdf:about="#Susan"/> > </owl:AllDisjoint> I realized the other day that this doesn't actually parse. AllDistinct parses as a typedNode there, not a propertyElement. parseType goes on propertyElements. It seems Jos already made the point in his message of Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:56:12 +0100 | I just don't see how rdf:parsetype="Collection" | could work in this case I don't think that's a show-stopper, but I suggest the chair confirm that the guide editor can explain how to use AllDistinc before making a decision about AllDistinct. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2003 14:37:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:56 GMT