W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: TEST: rdf compatibility

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:05:30 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f5cba859b67b37e@[10.0.0.19]>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

At 10:47 +0100 2/28/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>I have added two tests reflecting the chairs ruling on this issue (and
>similarly reflecting that ruling filed them under issue 5.2)
>
>http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#I5.2-010
>http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/snapshot#I5.2-011
>
>Out of order comment:
>
>These tests indicate that permitting the RDF container vocabulary causes no
>additional difficulties for OWL Lite reasoners.
>
>Moreover, for systems intending to support both RDF and OWL Lite (such as
>Jena), these tests require mechanisms that switch off RDF container support
>for OWL Lite.
>
>Further, there is an on-going cost of user confusion and user support when
>users try and migrate RDF files including containers to OWL Lite.
>
>Jeremy

Jeremy - as we've determined in some offline discussion, there's some 
disagreement about exactly what the ruling means and how it will be 
reflected in S&AS and Test - perhaps we should hold off on this one 
until we get that all resolved?
  -JH


-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 18:05:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT