Re: typing nodes

Then I don't understand what these rules are trying to get at.

peter


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: typing nodes
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 15:19:15 +0000

> 
> Peter - this is not intended as a replacement for other constraints.
> It is intended as a guide for what the mapping rules should be.
> I am not proposing changes that would allow the specific triple you exhibit.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> > Subject: Re: WOWG: Agenda Feb 6 telecon
> > Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:49:06 +0000
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > 
> >>Part of that which is baked, and ready for WG discussion is the following 
> >>suggestion:
> >>
> >>[[
> >>For every node of the graph and every URI reference used as a property or 
> >>datatype at least one of the following holds:
> >>+ It is one of the built-in URI references from RDF, RDFS, OWL or XML 
> >>Schema datatypes.
> >>+ It is a literal.
> >>+ It is the subject of at least one triple with predicate rdf:type; with an 
> >>object other than rdfs:Class, rdf:Property, owl:DeprecatedClass, 
> >>owl:DeprecatedProperty, owl:FunctionalProperty
> >>]]
> >>
> > 
> > This would allow
> > 
> >      ex:aa rdf:type ex:aa .
> > 
> > which doesn't sound very much like OWL DL to me.
> > 
> > peter
> > 
>

Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 10:36:52 UTC