W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: [Fwd: Review of Reference Document]

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 15:02:45 +0000
Message-ID: <15931.57749.693561.771439@merlin.horrocks.net>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org

On January 31, Jim Hendler writes:
> At 12:02 +0000 1/31/03, Ian Horrocks wrote:
> >  > Review of Language Reference Document
> >>  -------------------------------------
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >>  o Update Bullet 5 to say:
> >>	- OWL comes in 3 Layers. Lowest Layer OWL Lite is described in "Feature
> >>  Synopsis"
> >>	? General question, do we need a feature synopsis for OWL DL, 
> >>OWL Full ?
> >>
> >
> >1. Isn't it now called the "Overview" rather than the feature
> >synopsis?
> >
> >2. Surely the overview/synopsis describes all three layers?
> >
> >Ian
> 
> The document is available for all to look at and comment on [1]

Let me re-phrase:

The reference document shouldn't refer to the feature synopsis (which
it still does in the references) as it is now called the overview.

Ian
Received on Saturday, 1 February 2003 10:03:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:57 GMT