W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: QAF Ops Guidelines review action [LONG]

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:35:23 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f03bc06986dd3c1@[]>
To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Cc: ewallace@nist.gov

>>>1.4 WebOnt did well without the CR QA Framework
>>....  Extensive tests were
>>>defined and test results are now available [OWL-TEST-RESULTS] for ten
>>>different OWL tools.
>>actually we ended up with more than that (13 or 14 I think - cannot
>>check now as my server is flaky)
>The Tested Systems portion of Sandro's Test Results page lists 13.  Shall
>we go with this number?

how about "more than a dozen" - not that I'm superstitious or anything ...

>Need further feedback on the first issue.  Will add the others to my edit

I will try to suggest some wording - I like your idea of rewriting to 
make it clearer what is being objected to (i.e. what we are 
criticizing that QA did)


Professor James Hendler			  http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 18:34:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:56 UTC