W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: QAF Ops Guidelines review action [LONG]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:40:53 -0600
To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1071618053.7642.750.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 17:16, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:
> All,
> In response to a request [1] from the QA working group forwarded to WebOnt
> Jeremy and I have prepared: 
> I) summary and general WebOnt positions on the QA Framework (see [QAF-INTRO]),
> II) a QA Operational Guidelines [QAF-OPS] Case Study document for OWL,
> III) specific comments on the [QAF-OPS] document family as used for this
> case study.
> We solicit working group review

thumbs up here.

I was surprised to read that our charter doesn't include testing
materials as a deliverable, but I double-checked, and you're
right, it doesn't. I think it's in the RDF Core charter.

A nit, mostly to provide evidence that I read the whole thing:

> One potential test contribution appeared to be discouraged by this (the 
> handing of copyright to W3C). Offlist, the editor encouraged the submitter 
> to suggest different terms, but that appears to have presented a hurdle, 
> and not contribution or further discussion of IPR terms was had.

I think you meant "and no contribution or...".

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2003 18:40:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:56 UTC