W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > December 2003

Re: Please update OWL Test results -- today if possible

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:15:50 +0000
Message-ID: <3FD9E9B6.2040508@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, Minsu Jang <minsu@etri.re.kr>, evren@cs.umd.edu, Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, jack.berkowitz@networkinference.com


Dave who does the semantic tests for Jena has just gone home for the 
weekend; I have hand edited the result file to include the test passes and 
incomplete runs Dave has reported to the webont list.

The Jena syntax results are up to date.

Will there be a further chance to update our test results before 
Recommendation? (Crossing bridges, counting chickens etc etc) (We expect to 
have a new reasoning subsystem to report on in early January)


Sandro Hawke wrote:

> If OWL progresses to Proposed Recommendation, as I hope it will do
> very soon, the member companies will be asked to consider whether OWL
> should become a W3C Recommendation.  They will be given a link to the
> OWL Test Results page [1] as evidence of wide implementation, so the
> more green on the page, the better the prospects for OWL.
> I just noticed that only one feed (Bossam) has been updated since the
> changes to the editor's test suite [2] on 4 December.   Those changes
> were mostly involved Proposed tests, so I don't expect any surprises,
> but I think it would still be a very good idea to re-run the tests.  I
> also hope some OWL implementation have improved.   We have a few 100%
> columns on the reasoning tests; it would be nice to see a lot more.
> The target date for PR was three days ago, and we obviously didn't
> make it, but it might still happen very soon.  So there's some urgency
> here.  Improvements in the weeks to come would still be useful, of
> course.  If you know someone producing data who I missed on the "To"
> field, or who might not be reading their e-mail today, please try to let
> them know.
> If there's a possibility that your system has regressed on some tests,
> feel free to use a different URL for the new results, so you or I can
> easily see the differences.  Just let me know the new URL, of course.
>    -- sandro
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/08/owl-systems/test-results-out
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/Manifest.rdf
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 11:17:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:56 UTC