This is a general FYI. Ian Dickinson has noticed that the DIG interface makes the unique names assumption, and hence cannot be used very easily (if at all) for OWL, in its current generation. I had been hoping to get some OWL test results for racer through work going on both by Ian and Sean on using the DIG interface. I now no longer have that hope. Thus I am not expecting any significant new information between PR and REC concerning any of the OWL tests. (It may be that racer has unique names assumption deeply embedded within it - I don't know) (The current test approvals etc that we are voting on are based on our current information, and trying to make the best of what we know, which, in a few cases is less than I would like) JeremyReceived on Monday, 1 December 2003 06:01:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:03 GMT