On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > Sean - I assume that > xsd:short rdfs:subClassOf xsd:int. > xsd:int rdfs:subClassOf xsd:long. > xsd:long rdfs:subClassOf xsd:integer. > so a xsd:short is also a xsd:integer. That may be the case, but the Test document says: [[ The datatype theory of an OWL consistency checker MUST minimally support at least xsd:integer, xsd:string from [XML Schema Datatypes]. ]] Thus as an implementor, I can simply ignore test oneOf/004 (as it uses datatypes which are outside those that I support) and I can get away with not having to pass what might otherwise be an awkward test (which is fine by me, by the way with my implementation hat on :-) Sean -- Sean Bechhofer seanb@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~seanbReceived on Friday, 22 August 2003 22:20:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT