W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2003

WebOnt/OWL patent disclosures page enumerates all statements

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:03:50 -0400
Message-Id: <200308141803.h7EI3oGB016620@dr-nick.w3.org>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

amp;In-Reply-To=&lt;3B7D4E97.9229BEE5@bell-labs.com&gt;&amp;References=&lt;3B7D4E97.9229BEE5@bell-labs.com&gt;Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium (http://www.w3.org/)
Message-Id: <1060884229.12246.26.camel@dirk.dm93.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:03:49 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In previous WebOnt WG publications, I neglected to
follow this rule...

"All disclosure statements made by W3C Members are made public with each
publicly-visible Working Draft (public Working Draft, Last Call Working
Draft, Candidate Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation,
Recommendation)."
  -- 3. Disclosure Rules
  Current Patent Practice
  W3C Note 24 January 2002
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-patent-practice-20020124#sec-Disclosure
cited from the WebOnt charter
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/charter#L409

In preparation for a Candidate Recommendation publication of
OWL, the WebOnt WG disclosures page
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/discl
  $Revision: 1.14 $ of $Date: 2003/08/11 19:01:19 $
now includes details about each member organization's
patent disclosure statements. (expect the formatting
to change; there's some sort of common style emerging).

For the most part, it just gives the date each organization
checked the "no claims" box on the call for participation,
but for Lucent, Network Inference, and Stanford, who didn't check any
of the boxes, it has a copy of the statements they sent.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 14:03:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT