W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2003

RE: test manifest file

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:19:32 +0200
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDOEOMCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



I will try and explain my rationale, if it does not work for people, I am
happy to change:

Every test of one file has two associated levels (often the same).
One of these is the syntactic level of the file, the other is the 'level'
(typically semantic) of the test. Really for the NotOWLFeatureTest both of
these are redundant, and perhaps silence would be the best path.

Something that uses owl:foobar is normally syntactically not in OWL Lite or
OWL DL (although I suppose we could have a test that was e.g.

owl:foobar rdf:type owl:Class .

)

Thus for all the tests we currently have the syntactic level of the file is
given as OWL Full. I take Peter to not have difficulties with this.

The level of the test is then a bit moot.
I put "Lite" on the grounds that I would expect an OWL Lite consistency
checker to recognise that this was not an OWL feature and to produce a
warning message.

The change that I would be happiest with is simply removing the level of the
test.

Jeremy






> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Peter F.
> Patel-Schneider
> Sent: 08 August 2003 21:30
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: test manifest file
>
>
>
> The test manifest file appears to have the wrong levels for the
> NotOwlFeatureTest tests.  They are given level Lite.  However, they should
> be given level DL or, maybe, both Lite and DL, as not being in DL implies
> not being in Lite, but not vice versa.
>
> peter
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 06:45:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT