Sandro Hawke wrote: >>"The suggested reading order of the first four documents is as given, >>since they have >> been listed in increasing degree of technical content." >> >>(I could add something to state that >> "the last two documents complete the documentation set .) >> >> > >My sense is that the section as currently written is clear enough, but >if Frank feels strongly that the implied reading order is not clear >enough, I don't see any problem with your proposed change. > > > >>dan/sandro - should i put this in my editors draft right after the >>listing in the roadmap? (I released control on friday so i have not >>made any changes since then and do not want to hinder your release process.) >> >> > >That sounds fine. (I think I would have heard had Dan done anything >with them since then; if he has, I'll take responsibility for >propagating this change through.) > > -- sandro > > > OK - change made in the normal place for the editor's draft. that is the only change i made since i gave up write lock and i will not make any more (unless there is another request communicated). feel free to do whatever you need to do to push the publication through. thx, d -- Deborah L. McGuinness Knowledge Systems Laboratory Gates Computer Science Building, 2A Room 241 Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9020 email: dlm@ksl.stanford.edu URL: http://ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm (voice) 650 723 9770 (stanford fax) 650 725 5850 (computer fax) 801 705 0941Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 15:36:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT