W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2003

RE: review of wine.owl and food.owl

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 11:34:11 +0200
To: "Smith, Michael K" <michael.smith@eds.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEOCCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


These all look fine (I am just going by the e-mail except for the very last
point where I have looked at the latest editors draft).

Jeremy

>
> Responding to Jeremy's notes on wine and food.
>
> 0: A late MUST FIX
>
> > food.owl contains many sameIndividualAs which have not been updated to
> sameAs
>
> DONE.  Had been done but not uploaded.
>
> > 1: Base location
>
> > I think it is probably more appropriate to use the base location that
> > includes the publication URI so e.g. for the current WD it would be
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-guide-20030331/wine#
> > ...
>
> Pending my improved understanding of how and when to synchronize this.
> I don't want an editor's draft out there with dangling references.
>
> > 2: Changing suffix to .rdf
> >
> > Given that we decided not to register a mime type I think we should be
> using
> > the .rdf suffix rather than a .owl suffix.
>
> DONE.
>
> > 3: (if doing 1)
> > If you decide to follow the suggestion in point 1, then it may
> be helpful
> to
> >
> > replace the namespace declarations with entity refs to minimize
> the points
>
> > of change.
> >
> > e.g.
> > <rdf:RDF
> >   xmlns     = "&vin;"
> >   xmlns:vin = "&vin;"
> >   xml:base  = "&vin;"
> >   xmlns:food= "&food;"
> >   xmlns:owl = "&owl;"
> >   xmlns:rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> >   xmlns:rdfs= "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
>
> I haven't done this.  The question is, should I?  I like it and
> had intended
> to do so, but it seems to me there was some past inhibition.
>
> > 4: making food.owl conform with OWL DL
> > (I can't remember if we have already discussed this - if you
> have already
> > rejected this suggestion apologies for repeating myself)
> > ...
> > This can be rectified in three different ways:
> >
> > a) easy way
> >     import wine.owl from food.owl
>
> DONE.  And I added a comment in food.owl briefly explaining option b.
>
> > b) harder way
> >     include specifc type information in food.owl, e.g. above fragment
>
> > 5: delete xmlns:xsd="...." from wine.owl
> >
> > This is not used
>
> But I use it in some of the text in the Guide.  So I left it.
>
> > 6. Keeping wine.owl in OWL DL - imports object
> >
> > Food.owl declares its own URI to be of type owl:Ontology using the
> xml:base
> > and the idiom
> >    <owl:Ontology rdf:about="">
> >
> > The xml:base ends in a # which gets ignored when resolving the
> empty same
> > document reference, so that the subject of the rdf:type owl:Ontology
> triple
> > is the URIref
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food
> >
> > However the object of the owl:imports triple is
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/guide-src/food.owl
> >
> > While the imports mechanism works, this uriref remains untyped
> and so the
> > document is in OWL Full.
> >
> > Deleting the .owl suffix may work (it definitely will work if
> you use .rdf
> > as your suffix).
>
> DONE.  Using .rdf suffix.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:45 PM
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: review of wine.owl and food.owl
>
>
>
>
> A late MUST FIX
>
> food.owl contains many sameIndividualAs which have not been updated to
> sameAs
>
> Jeremy
>
>
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 05:40:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT