W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Guide Comments: Proposed response to Antoine Isaac

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:15:02 +0300
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200304272115.02183.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


I am not following this thread, but ...

 > > -> section 3.4.2
> > > 
> > > [
> > > owl:maxCardinality can be used to specify an upper
> > > bound. owl:minCardinality can be used to specify a lower bound. In 
> > > combination, the two can be used to specify a range. ]
> > > 
> > > Perhaps a typo : "cardinality" (or "owl:cardinality") instead of 
> > > "range" ?
> > 
> > I'm using range in the [n...m] sense.  Will change to "numeric range".
> 
> For my humble brains it stills sound confusing. A numerical function
> may have something called a "numeric range", but in my opinion it
> would still be the "owl:range" meaning (even though restrected to a
> set of numbers). How about using "cardinality range" ?

My 2c is: "integer interval" a standard mathematical term for the concept you 
are after (I think) without using the r word.

Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:26:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT