W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: inaccuracies in Appendices A, B, and C of OWL Reference

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:33:40 +0200
To: "Guus Schreiber <schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3F676CA6.6DE3738F-ONC1256D13.00801F58-C1256D13.00816EC0@agfa.be>


I thought that

owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:priorVersion.
owl:incompatibleWith rdfs:subPropertyOf owl:priorVersion.

and thus there is no need to specify that

owl:backwardCompatibleWith rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty.
owl:incompatibleWith rdf:type owl:OntologyProperty.

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/


                                                                                                                       
                    Guus Schreiber                                                                                     
                    <schreiber@cs.vu.n       To:     "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>          
                    l>                       cc:     www-webont-wg@w3.org                                              
                    Sent by:                 Subject:     Re: inaccuracies in Appendices A, B, and C of OWL Reference  
                    www-webont-wg-requ                                                                                 
                    est@w3.org                                                                                         
                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                       
                    2003-04-25 04:40                                                                                   
                    PM                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                       





Peter,

The changes to Reference you proposed yesterday have been incorporated
into the editor's draft (see the change log). As a followup on your
comment wrt. owl:OntologyProperty I've also added a note to Sec. 7.2
about this  built-in property class.

Thanks, Guus


Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> owl:imports, owl:priorVersion, owl:backwardCompatibleWith, and
> owl:incompatibleWith should all be specified to belong to
> owl:OntologyProperty
>
> owl:DataRange could be specified as a subclass of rdfs:Literal
>
> owl:AnnotationProperty, owl:DataRange, and owl:TransitiveProperty are
> missing from the classes defined by OWL, which should be changed to
> ``Classes in the OWL vocabulary''.  owl:AnnotationProperty is missing
from
> Appendix A.
>
> Similarly the next heading should be
> changed to ``Properties in the OWL vocabulary''.
>
> The range of owl:imports could be specified as owl:Ontology
>
> The domain of owl:OneOf is rdfs:Class, not owl:Class.  This needs to
> be changed in both Appendix B and C.
>
> Appendix A is not alphabetized correctly.
>

--
NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003

Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 19:34:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT