W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions

From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 11:44:02 -0700
Message-Id: <200304231844.LAA03370@escher.SD.BBN.COM>
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, www-webont-wg@w3.org 

> First, I think the reference needs to discuss
> what is the preferred way for writing multiple restrictions on a single
> property (I assume this is as an intersectionOf Restrictions, although
> this is very ugly, and I much prefer the syntax used in my previous
> message, if it's legal and correct OWL).

Agreed.  I normally use multiple Restrictions with the same
value for onProperty.

	Mike
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 14:45:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT