> In section 4.2, the discussion on "sameAs" and "sameIndividualAs" is > confusing. The guide recommends using "sameIndividualAs", but the > reference document, section 5.2, says that "sameIndividualAs" is > supported for "historical reasons". I have not looked at the sections of either document, but judging by what is here it looks like the guide is closer to S&AS than reference. owl:sameAs is not in OWL DL, so owl:sameIndividualAs is preferred, I believe. JeremyReceived on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 01:40:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT