Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions

As I recall the discussion at the Amsterdam F2F -- I had wondered if such
features would be needed by biomedical ontologies and thought that I was
told that this wasn't the case.

The use cases he cites are compelling (at least to me), and if indeed
qualified cardinalities *are* needed to support these then I strongly
support reopening the issue.

Jonathan


>
> The following long message (from [1]) comes from Alan Rector to our
> comments list, addressing the issue of the qualified constraints -
> basically, he's asking us to reopen issue 3.2 Qualified Cardinality
> constraints.  Guus and I would like to hear the WG's feelings on
> this.  Since there's no specific document addressed (although it
> would require changes in every document), Guus and I will handle this
> email and its response.
>   -JH
> [1]
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0040.html
>