W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: TEST agenda item

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:22:22 +0200
To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFBDDFB50B.77B2807B-ONC1256D09.007E5539-C1256D09.0080644C@agfa.be>


I agree and found that we had some wrong entailments
in our implementation, which we now took out
(not changing the status quo we reported yesterday).

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

PS If I'm not mistaken, in the description-logic tests
   a consistency test is a negative entailment test
   with conclusion
   oiled:Satisfiable owl:equivalentClass owl:Nothing.
   Right?
   Can one do that in datalog?




                                                                                                                       
                    Jeremy Carroll                                                                                     
                    <jjc@hpl.hp.com>         To:     www-webont-wg@w3.org                                              
                    Sent by:                 cc:                                                                       
                    www-webont-wg-requ       Subject:     TEST agenda item                                             
                    est@w3.org                                                                                         
                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                       
                    2003-04-15 02:30                                                                                   
                    PM                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                       






I propose that test cardinality-005 be demoted from APPROVED to PROPOSED.
I would be happy for it to be a proposed non-entailment rather than a
proposed
entailment.

See:

http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/#cardinality-005

and

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2003Apr/0049.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2003Apr/0060.html

i.e the test as its stands is wrong in OWL Full, but too closely related to

tests that are right in OWL DL.


Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 19:22:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT