W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:32:06 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030414.133206.98584322.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

Does this mean that I can send out an appropriately-revised reply?  

peter



From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:53:33 -0400

> Peter - I think this would handle things right, and we could reopen 
> the issue of whether owl:nothing should be in Lite.  I have one small 
> suggestion
> 
> >I believe that the explanatory text adequately makes the distinction
> >between named and anonymous individuals, and that there does not need to be
> >separate productions for them, particularly as the productions are very
> >similar.
> 
> 
> How about citing some of the relevant text and saying
> 
> The following text
>   " ... "
> explains the difference between named and anonymous individuals, 
> There does not need to be separate productions for them as the 
> productions are very similar.
> 
> this way, you can direct him to the particular part of the document 
> that answers his question, rather than making him search for it.
> 
>   -JH
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
> Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
> Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
> Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  240-731-3822 (Cell)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 13:32:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT